Amicus Brief in Disability Rights Wisconsin v. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, et al.

…ey State Bar No. 1016628 809.19 NoteCERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 809.19(12) I hereby certify that 809.19 NoteI have submitted an electronic copy of this brief, excluding the appendix, if any, which complies with the requirements of Wis. Stat. § 809.19(12). I further certify that t809.19 Notehis electronic brief is identical in content and format to the printed form of the brief filed as of this date. 809.19 NoteA copy of this certific…

AMICUS BRIEF OF DISABILITY RIGHTS AMICI: NOT DEAD YET, ADAPT, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK, DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND, NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING, AND THE UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION

…isted Suide in Oregon: A Medical Perspective, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1613 (2008) 18 H. Hendin and Gerald Klerman, Phvsician-Assisted Suicide: The Dangers of Legalization, 150 Am. J. of Psych. 143 (Jan.1993) 20 Brendan D. Kelly et al., Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide and Psychiatry: A Pandora’s Box, 181 British J. Psychiatry 278, 279 (2002) 14 Evan J. Kemp, Could You Please Die Now?, Wash. Post, Jan. 5, 1997…………. 15 S. Miles, Physicians and Their P…

NDY et al. Amicus Brief in New Mexico Supreme Court in Morris v. Brandenburg

…isted Suide in Oregon: A Medical Perspective, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1613 (2008) 18 Hendin and Gerald Klerman, Phvsician-Assisted Suicide: The Dangers of Legalization, 150 Am. J. of Psych. 143 (Jan.1993) 20 Brendan D. Kelly et al., Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide and Psychiatry: A Pandora’s Box, 181 British J. Psych. 278, 279 (2002) 14 Evan J. Kemp, Could You Please Die Now?, Wash. Post, Jan. 5, 1997…….. 15-16 James V. Lavery, et al, Origins of th…

Not Dead Yet’s Public Comment to U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services on Affordable Care Act’s Nondiscrimination Regulations

…ent, the Act mandates that the care must be provided.” IN RE D.L.H., 2 A.3d 505 (2010). Had it not been for the effective action of the P&A attorneys, it is doubtful that Mr. Hockenberry would have survived. Brain Injury and the Rush To Judgment Professional literature in the field of neurology indicates that there is an appropriate “waiting period” for rendering a relatively though not absolutely certain prognosis that the individual is permanent…

NDY Comments on Adult Protective Services Guidelines – Health Care Decision-Making

…ent, the Act mandates that the care must be provided.” IN RE D.L.H., 2 A.3d 505 (2010). Had it not been for the effective action of the P&A attorneys, it is doubtful that Mr. Hockenberry would have survived. Illustrative Case – Brain Injury and the Rush To Judgment One group affected by surrogate decisions and unilateral provider decisions is people who are diagnosed as “vegetative” following a traumatic brain injury such as a car accident or an a…