Disability Rights Activist Pam Auer to Represent NDY at My Medicaid Matters Rally in Harrisburg, PA on Wednesday, October 17

Disability Rights Activist Pam Auer to Represent Not Dead Yet at My Medicaid

Matters Rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on Wednesday, October 17

On Wednesday, October 17, National ADAPT is leading a My Medicaid Matters Rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania to oppose cuts to Medicaid. Disability rights activist Pam Auer will represent Not Dead Yet as one of the speakers at the Rally.

 

Pam Auer (front,left) at My Medicaid Matters Rally in Wasington, D.C. (Sep 2011)

Harrisburg, PA (PRWEB) October 17, 2012

On Wednesday, October 17, ADAPT, a national direct action disability rights organization, is sponsoring the My Medicaid Matters Rally in Harrisburg Pennsylvania to oppose cuts to Medicaid home care services. Disability rights activist Pam Auer will speak on behalf of Not Dead Yet at the Rally. Not Dead Yet opposes legalization of assisted suicide.

Read the rest of the press release here.

Three MDs weigh in on assisted suicide

Today’s Boston Globe has two letters by doctors who are opposed to legalization of assisted suicide – and are responding to a glowing endorsement of assisted suicide by Marcia Angell, MD, in an op-ed published in the paper on September 29.  The letters to the Globe are at this link, but can’t be accessed directly without a paid subscription for online access.  Fortunately, someone emailed them to us and they’re reproduced below:

As a physician who has been taking care of dying patients in Massachusetts for years, I found Dr. Marcia Angell’s Sept. 29 op-ed “A method for dying with dignity” chilling. Physicians who oppose Question 2 are not concerned about their “self-image,” but rather for the welfare of their patients.

In my experience suicide is a tragedy whether it occurs years, months, or days before natural death. I have been asked for a lethal medication a number of times. Behind the request lies terrible fear. By drawing these fears out and addressing them, we help patients pass through the crisis that leads them to turn to suicide.

Suicide is not a purely autonomous act; it has deep, long-lasting effects on loved ones and society. Even when an individual loses the sense of the value of one’s life, those around the individual do not.

The referendum has no provision for notification of family members, and no requirement that anyone be present when the lethal dose is taken. The patient is left alone with the poison, all in the name of autonomy. To embrace suicide as a medical treatment is to cut at the heart of what unites us as a Commonwealth.

Dr. Jane A. Driver

Boston

The writer is in the division of aging at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and is assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.

 

Dr. Marcia Angell (“A method for dying with dignity,” Op-ed, Sept. 29) wrote that the Massachusetts Medical Society opposed physician-assisted suicide because it is inconsistent with physicians’ “self-image” as healers. However, the rejection of the so-called Death with Dignity Act by the majority of physicians is based on much broader medical considerations.

Twenty to 40 percent of medical diagnoses prove wrong when confronted with the ultimate criterion of truth, the autopsy. This means that the license to cause deaths on the grounds of medical diagnoses can lead to tragic mistakes.

The act would allow prescriptions for lethal drugs to be given to patients with a life expectancy of no more than six months. This too is a potential source of serious blunders because physicians’ ability to predict how soon a patient would die is notoriously unreliable.

In addition, the Dutch experience has shown that the acceptance of death as a medical solution is suppressing the performance of doctors and nurses in critical situations when life is threatened but can still be saved.

Dr. Richard Fenigsen

Waltham

On September 30th, another physician weighed in on assisted suicide at PsychCentral.  In an essay titled ‘Merciful Assistance or Physician-Assisted Killing?,’ Ronald Pies, MD had a skeptical take on assisted suicide as well:

Imagine that your father, age 85, has been diagnosed with a terminal illness and given only three months to live.

Fortunately, he is still well enough to walk, and finds himself one night near a tall bridge. Having contemplated the suffering he believes will attend his final days, he decides to end his life by jumping off the bridge. However, he is too weak to hoist himself up atop the protective railing.

Suddenly, he sees his very own physician, Dr. Jones, walking by. He begs Dr. Jones to help him climb atop the railing, adding, “Don’t worry, Doc, it will be my decision to jump.” The doctor is taken aback, but quickly determines that his patient is not psychotic or severely depressed, and is capable of making a rational decision regarding suicide. The doctor tries to persuade your dad that pain and suffering can usually be well-controlled during the final days, but the patient is insistent: he wants to end his life.

Would you agree that Dr. Jones is fulfilling his obligations as a physician by assisting your father in jumping off the bridge?

If not, would you support the doctor’s providing your father with a lethal dose of medication?

That’s just the beginning of the essay – please read the rest of it here.

 

 

MEDIA ADVISORY(Mass) – Forum and Discussion of Ballot Question 2 at Boston Public Library Oct. 3, 2 pm to 4 pm with NDY CEO Diane Coleman

October 2, 2012

For Immediate Release

Contact: Yvette Ollada

617.902.0662

***MEDIA ADVISORY***

Boston Center for Independent Living and Second Thoughts Sponsor Forum on Question 2

Wednesday, October 3 at Boston Public Library

Who:  Boston Center for Independent Living & Second Thoughts – People with Disabilities Opposing Question 2

What: Forum and discussion of Ballot Question 2 featuring Diane Coleman – President and CEO of Not Dead Yet, a national grassroots disability rights organization opposing the legalization of assisted suicide. She founded Not Dead Yet in 1996 and served as Board Chair until becoming CEO in 2011. Ms. Coleman is a well-known writer and speaker on assisted suicide and euthanasia, and has appeared in national broadcasts on Washington Journal, Nightline, McLaughlin, The Rolanda Show, The Charles Grodin Show, CBS Up To the Minute, ABC World News Tonight, CNN (Connie Chung, Paula Zahn, Headline News), The Catherine Crier Show,Court TV, CBS Evening News, MSNBC’s The Abrahms Report, Fox News The Neil Cavuto Show, Fox and Friends and National Public Radio, as well as local broadcast outlets in several states. She has presented invited testimony before Subcommittees of the U.S. House of Representatives or Senate four times (April 29, 1996, July 14, 1998, April 19, 2005 and May 25, 2006). From 2003 to 2008, she was a member of the adjunct faculty at the University of Illinois at Chicago and co-taught graduate courses in disability and medical ethics. Ms. Coleman is a person with significant disabilities who has used a motorized wheelchair since the age of eleven.

When:  Wednesday, October 3, 2012 – 2pm to 4pm

Where: Boston Public Library, 700 Boylston St., Mezzanine Level Conference Room

###

No On Question 2 is a diverse coalition of disability rights organizations, doctors, nurses, community leaders, faith based groups and patient rights advocates.

www.NoOnQuestion2.org

www.Twitter.com/NoOnQuestion2MA

www.Facebook.com/NoOnBallotQuestion2

 

New Press Release from ‘No on 2’ (Mass.) – State Rep. John Rogers (D-Norwood) says ‘No’ to Ballot Question 2

New Press Release from NoOn2,

(The image above is a graphic rendering of “No on 2”)

For Immediate Release

September 26, 2012

Contact: Tim Rosales

617.902.0662

 

State Rep. John Rogers (D-Norwood) says ‘No’ to Ballot Question 2

“particularly concerned about issues like cost-cutting, no requirement for a psychiatric evaluation…”

 

Boston – Adding his name to the growing list of opponents to Ballot Question 2 is State Representative John Rogers (D-Norwood). Representative Rogers joins organizations like the Boston Center for Independent Living, Cambridge Commission for Persons with Disabilities and others across Massachusetts opposing Ballot Question 2.

 

“As a Democrat committed to improving the quality of life for our citizens, I have a number of problems with Ballot Question 2 and am endorsing a ‘No’ vote,” said State Rep. John Rogers.

 

“I am particularly concerned about issues like cost-cutting, no requirement for a psychiatric evaluation and that there is no real state oversight.  I believe that these concerns expressed in large part by Massachusetts’ disability rights community, should be given serious weight and Ballot Question 2 defeated.”

 

State Representative John Rogers was first elected to the Massachusetts House of Representatives in November of 1992 and, is currently serving his ninth term as a legislator. He represents the 12th Norfolk District which includes 38,000 citizens in the towns of Norwood and Walpole. John served as House Majority Leader from January 2005 through January 2009. Currently he is a member of the committees on Education, Labor and Workforce Development, and Veterans and Federal Affairs.

 

Ballot Question 2 on the November statewide ballot seeks to legalize assisted suicide in Massachusetts. For more information about No On Question 2 and reasons to oppose this measure go to: http://www.noonquestion2.org/index.php/about/faq

 

###

No On Question 2 is a diverse coalition of disability rights organizations, doctors, nurses, community leaders, faith based groups and patient rights advocates.

 

www.NoOnQuestion2.org

www.Twitter.com/NoOnQuestion2MA

www.Facebook.com/NoOnBallotQuestion2

 

Press Release (Mass.) Disability Rights leaders reach out to Elizabeth Warren regarding ‘No On 2’

For Immediate Release

September 25, 2012

Contact: Tim Rosales

617-902-0662

 

 

Disability Rights leaders reach out to Elizabeth Warren regarding ‘No On 2’

Ask to meet and discuss reasons why many progressives oppose assisted suicide

 

 

Boston, MA – State and national disability rights/social justice advocates are asking Massachusetts United States Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren to meet about Ballot Question 2 and discuss their reasons for strongly opposing this measure to legalize assisted suicide.   The disability rights leaders include: John Kelly – Executive Director of Second Thoughts and former Chair of the Boston Disability Advisory Commission, Karen Shneiderman – Senior Advocacy Specialist for Boston Center for Independent Living Inc, Marilyn Golden – Senior Policy Analyst for the Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund and Diane Coleman – President of Not Dead Yet.  All are part of the diverse coalition that oppose legalization of assisted suicide, which is what Ballot Question 2 would do in Massachusetts if approved.

 

“Ballot question 2 contains a number of problematic issues that raise red flags with progressive voters.  These are arguments and perspectives Ms. Warren may not have heard yet, and are asking for the opportunity to meet and brief her and her team,” said John Kelly, Executive Director of Second Thoughts and former Chair of the Advisory Board to the Boston Disability Commission.

 

“We already have seen serious cost cutting pressures. We constantly hear about the costs of caring for people in the last year of their lives. We can point to examples in Oregon and Washington, where assisted suicide is legal of these implicit and explicit cost pressures. Ballot question 2 legalizes a $100 lethal prescription and that sends a terrible message to people living with serious illness or disability.

 

“As a lifelong Democrat, I have a deep respect for Ms. Warren.  I truly hope we are able to discuss this issue that is so critically important to the Massachusetts disability community.”

 

Yesterday to WTKK-FM, Elizabeth Warren made a comment that she was leaning toward supporting assisted suicide legalization.

 

Disability rights organizations that have come out in opposition to legalization of assisted suicide include:

American Disabled for Attendant Programs Today (ADAPT), Association of Programs for Rural Independent Living (APRIL), Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN), Boston Center for Independent Living, Disability Policy Consortium, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), Justice For All (JFA), MetroWest Center for Independent Living, National Council on Independent Living (NCIL), National Spinal Cord Injury Association, Not Dead Yet (NDY), TASH, The World Association of Persons with Disabilities (WAPD), The World Institute on Disability (WID).

 

###

You can access the original press release here.

Background: Apparently, Ms. Warren said she was ‘leaning’ toward supporting Ballot Question 2 – which would legalize assisted suicide in Massachusetts.  It’s hard to believe that Ms. Warren has taken a close look at the wording of proposed legislation, virtually identical to statutes in Oregon and Washington states.  As one of the leading consumer advocates in the country, she’s better equipped than most to look at legislation – including ‘safeguards’ – and see just who gets the highest level of protection under the law.

Here’s an example from a ‘Safeguards’ fact sheet from the Disability Rights and Defense Fund (DREDF):

Spurious Safeguard #4: Doctors will be held legally accountable.

In Fact: Oregon’s law establishes a standard that protects doctors from legal liability if they act in “good faith.” This is almost impossible to disprove. It legalizes negligence.

Remember the old adage ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’?  A “Good Faith” standard against legal liability provides not just an excuse, but ironclad immunity from any legal liability or accountability.
More as this story develops…