The doctor said it would be better if I didn’t survive

… as I would be a “vegetable” if I did

By Stephen Drake

I was born in 1955. I developed hydrocephalus as a result of injury from forceps used in a breech delivery.  Right after I was born, I was whisked away by the medical team.  My parents didn’t get to see me or hear anything much about me for hours.  Finally, the doctor who delivered me and caused the injury told my parents it would be better if I didn’t survive as I would be a “vegetable” if I did.  Specifically, he told them that the odds were 100 to 1 against my living through the night.  If I did survive it would be worse, since the odds were a million to one against me not being a ‘vegetable.’ (The usual ‘won’t talk, won’t walk, be a burden’ description).  He suggested it would be best if ‘nature took its course,’ which would mean, I guess, doing nothing to treat me and ‘allowing’ me to die.

Luckily for me, my parents had other ideas.  Even though they swear they weren’t afraid the medical staff would give less than aggressive care, my father spent the entire first night of my life watching over me through the nursery window, along with the pediatrician they had already selected for my medical care.  By the next morning, I was much improved, my skin tone normalized from the grayish tone from the day before.  I regained movement on the side of my face that had previously been immobile (no one can remember which side and the medical records are lost in the dustbin of medical history).

Over the next two months, it was clear by my lethargy and head growth that I was developing hydrocephalus – an accumulation of spinal fluid in the brain.  When I was about three months old, I had a lumbar shunt implanted in the base of the spine to promote drainage of spinal fluid.  This worked well until I was three. At that point, it became obvious that intracranial pressure was building again. That was when I had the ventricular shunt put in. This never really worked very well. I got headaches 1 to 3 times a day – my parents had to relieve the pressure by massaging the shunt. That’s how we all lived until I was ten.

At that time, I developed a headache that lasted for two weeks – it turns out I had outgrown the shunt. Due to advances in the shunt technology, they did a replacement instead of a revision. I’ve had that shunt, with little trouble, ever since.

The reason the surgeon didn’t attempt to correct problems with the first shunt was the uncertainty that my situation could be improved with only one surgery.  He – and everyone else – was new at it.  He really didn’t know if he would improve things at all on one attempt or how many attempts it would take.  Further, each operation carried a significant chance of infection, which was the leading cause of death in shunted kids with hydrocephalus.

I grew up being taught that my survival and lack of intellectual disability (mostly, anyway) was a ‘miracle.’  As an adult and graduate student, I came to know better.  If there were any ‘miraculous’ parts to my story, it was that my parents rejected the physician’s suggestions that maybe I – and they – would be better off if I died.  I was also extremely lucky that there was one – and only one – neurosurgeon in town who knew how to implant shunts at just the time that I needed one.

 

There are two other things I came to understand as I got older as well.  First, the odds the doctor cited for my survival and recovery were almost certainly made up on the spot and were aimed at getting my parents to ‘accept’ my death as a good, if not clearly inevitable, thing.  Second, as I’ve learned from the stories of others, when a doctor uses the word ‘vegetable’ about a patient, they will certainly follow up with a discussion of warehousing or ‘disposal’ (by way of medical neglect).

Visit Steve’s Water on the Brain – and Lots on My Mind blog.

 

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit

text text “Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Qui

John Kelly

With assisted suicide, self-determination is just a slogan

John Kelly, Director of Second Thoughts: People with Disabilities Opposing the Legalization of Assisted Suicide, gave the following testimoney March 6, 2012, at the Statehouse in Massachusetts in opposition to the 2012 state ballot question to legalize assisted suicide.

I … speak to the issue of self-determination, on which hinges the proponents’ argument for the law.

But the fact is that we already have self determination, as we can refuse any and all lifesaving treatment. Gone are the days of unnecessary invasive treatments. People can have an advance directive, they can choose someone to make decisions if they can’t. And you have the right to pain relief, all the way up to palliative sedation, which in effect lets you die in your sleep. For these reasons, the law is unnecessary.

This law restricts choice as it jeopardizes lives. Misdiagnosis has always impacted self-determination, but this law makes misdiagnosis fatal. In Oregon, Jeanette Hall requested prescribed suicide after receiving a terminal diagnosis with cancer. Her doctor persuaded her to try more treatment. 11 years after her diagnosis, her recent letter to the Globe urged us to avoid Oregon’s mistake.

Economic pressure already restricts patient choice, this law makes it a scandal. In Oregon, cancer patients Barbara Wagner and Randy Stroup were denied life extending treatment. The same rejection letter offered to cover $50 worth of barbiturates.. How long before we have similar cases here?

The law ignores social context and family pressures. The first doctor Oregonian Kate Cheney saw thought her daughter was coercing her. But no data gets gathered from doctors who say no, and there is no penalty for doctors to do not report. As in Kate Cheney’s case, it only takes one doctor to write the prescription. After her family put her in a nursing home for a week, Kate finally said yes the day she returned home. She was dead the same day.

The law allows an heir with a financial interest to be one of the two witnesses for the request, and takes no interest in what happens to the drugs when brought into the home. Elder abuse is already a huge problem in Massachusetts, let’s not compound it.

With assisted suicide, self-determination becomes a slogan, not a reality.

For more information about John Kelly and Second Thoughts in Massachusetts, go to www.second-thoughts.org.

With National Day of Mourning, Disability Community Remembers Disabled Victims of Domestic Violence

Disability rights advocates in cities across America will be holding vigils this Friday, March 30th to honor the lives of disabled people murdered by their families and caretakers. This nation-wide Day of Mourning is being organized by the Autistic Self Advocacy Network(ASAN) and Not Dead Yet in response to the murder of George Hodgins, a 22-year-old autistic man, and the media coverage that the organizations describe as “sympathetic” to his murderer.

On March 6, George Hodgins was reportedly murdered by his mother in Sunnyvale, California. Elizabeth Hodgins killed herself after fatally shooting her son. The Santa Cruz Sentinel referred to Ms. Hodgins as “a devoted and loving mother.” The Mercury News coverage appeared focused on the stress Hodgins’ mother underwent as a parent of an autistic child. “Some articles asked readers to put themselves in the shoes of the murderer,” said Zoe Gross, a member of ASAN, “but no articles called for empathy for the murder victim, who died knowing that his own parent had chosen to kill him.”

ASAN held a vigil for George Hodgins in Sunnyvale on March 16th. During the vigil, mourners read a list of names, beginning with Tracy Latimer, a disabled teenager killed by her father in 1993. (R. v. Latimer, 2001 SCC 1, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 3.) At the same time as ASAN’s vigil was being held, Tracy’s father was speaking on a television panel on Canadian Global News, arguing for legalizing the killing of disabled people – in the name of “mercy.” The television program was followed by an online liveblog, during which Canadian Global News continued to promote Latimer’s views. Not Dead Yet, a national disability rights group opposed to euthanasia, and other people with disabilities participated through online discussion to challenge Latimer and his fellow pro-euthanasia panel members in a debate during the online blog.

“When disabled people are murdered by caretakers or family members, many people justify these murders as ‘understandable,’ or talk about the ‘burden’ of caring for someone with a disability,” said Ms. Gross. “This is the view that was aired on Canadian Global News and in many news articles covering the murder of George Hodgins. Many people are quick to justify the murder of a disabled person when they would offer no such justification if the murder victim were not disabled.”

ASAN and Not Dead Yet have declared a National Day of Mourning in response to George Hodgins’ murder, Robert Latimer’s television appearance and what they describe as “the broader trend of sympathetic press coverage for people who murder their disabled family members.” On March 30th, disabled people will come together in cities across America to hold vigils and memorial services to honor murder victims with disabilities and to demonstrate to the community that the lives of disabled people have value.