More on Karen McCarron’s Sentence

The first accounts of the sentencing hearing were short on details. There are a few more out. I think they bear reading for a fuller picture of the atmosphere in the courtroom that day.

Yesterday, the Peoria Journal-Star featured an article by Kevin Sempier titled “McCarron Shows Remorse“:

PEKIN – Karen McCarron stood trembling in a courtroom Tuesday, apologized for suffocating her autistic daughter and was sentenced to 36 years in prison, saying she doesn’t deserve forgiveness from those she hurt.

Reading a handwritten statement from a sheet of lined notebook paper, McCarron apologized and said she would take back the moment in May 2006 when she killed her 3-year-old daughter, Katherine “Katie” McCarron, if she could.

“I reach out to all of those I hurt the most,” she said, and began to read a long list of names that included her husband, Paul McCarron. “I reach out to them, but not for forgiveness. I understand that I do not deserve it.”

Kevin Johnson, chief assistant state’s attorney for Tazewell County, commented on the sentencing on behalf of the McCarron family:

Speaking on behalf of Paul McCarron’s side of the family, Johnson said they are ready for the next chapter in their lives.

“They’re relieved that this is over,” Johnson said. “They feel justice has been served, and they’re ready to move on.”

Tenth Judicial Circuit Court Judge Stephen Kouri had these words to say, according to Robert Kerns of the Pekin Daily Times:

While speaking to the McCarron family, Kouri told them that he believed that Katie was lucky enough to have been born into a family that loved her.

“I believe that Katie McCarron won the lottery the day she was born into your family. But I know you may think that it was you who had won the lottery.”

I think that judge Kouri’s sentiments reflect the impressions that many of us have gotten of the McCarrons, mostly through the words of Mike McCarron, Katie’s grandfather.

Finally, Billy Dennis at the Peoria Pundit was kind enough to alert this blog that he’s going to be talking about this trial and “Autism Awareness” on his radio show and invites call-ins:

PeoriaPunditRadio: Autism Debate

April is autism month. I thought it appropriate to devote at least one Peoria Pundit Radio segment to debate on the myths and reality surrounding this condition. The next show is scheduled for 6 p.m. Friday — that’s two days from now. Autism certainly has been in the news recently, from Sen. John McCain jumping on the autism is caused by vaccines bandwagon, to Karen McCarron’ sentencing for killing her daughter with autism. So I’m hoping for a lively debate. Please call at (347) 326-9459.

I plan on accepting his invitation to listen and call in. I hope others will as well. –Stephen Drake

Transcript for Fox News Story on Kevorkian

As promised, this is the transcript of the video linked in the last post:

JACK KEVORKIAN, ASSISTED SUICIDE ADVOCATE: The only qualification you need is what I said, you’re a citizen.

JEFF GOLDBLATT, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): He has been called Dr. Death. But soon assisted suicide advocate Jack Kevorkian hopes to replace that nickname with the title of congressman.

KEVORKIAN: I want to run for Congress to make a change. I want to fight for our rights.

GOLDBLATT: Specifically a person’s individual rights, as spelled out in the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution. Though vague and far reaching, the Ninth Amendment protects rights not explicitly specified elsewhere in the Constitution. Kevorkian called it the most fundamental and ignored of all rights.

KEVORKIAN: It says that you have every right in the world, because you’re born with them, as long as nobody gets hurt or threatened or their property is not hurt or threatened, you have every right in the world.

GOLDBLATT: Including a run for Congress, which a 79-year-old convicted felon retains despite serving more than eight years in prison for the assisted suicide of a Michigan man. During the 90s Kevorkian claims to have helped 130 people die, a legacy which makes him a poor choice for Congress, according to disability rights advocate Stephen Drake.

STEPHEN DRAKE, DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATE: Kevorkian has never fought for anybody’s rights but his own. He wants to be the center of attention. That’s what this is about.

KEVORKIAN: Do you think I’m making a mockery of it when I’m fighting for my rights? Goethe said, “No one is more enslaved than the one who thinks he is free.” You’re not free! Look at me. I did something that it should have been anybody’s right to do and I end up in prison.

GOLDBLATT: Kevorkian says on reputation alone, he will collect the 3,000 signatures by mid July to be placed on the ballot as an independent in Michigan’s Ninth District. His opponents, the former Michigan lottery commissioner and Democrat Gary Peters and eight term GOP incumbent Joe Knollenberg, tell Fox News they want to focus on the economy and not Kevorkian. One political science professor says Kevorkian could be a factor in this race, but Dave Dulio predicts that Kevorkian won’t win partly because he won’t take campaign contributions.

DAVE DULIO, OAKLAND UNIVERSITY POLI SCI PROF: He has name identification, yes, but you can’t get elected on name identification alone. You need to tell people why they should vote for you rather than the other candidates. That’s
what he can’t do with no money.

GOLDBLATT: Kevorkian stresses it is an independent message that counts, not the money.

KEVORKIAN: Nobody in any party or any religion really has a free mind.

GOLDBLATT (on camera): Kevorkian says he won’t hire a campaign staff. He will meet voters the old-fashioned way, face to face. Most candidates wouldn’t stand a chance with such a low profile strategy then again the high profile Jack Kevorkian is far from your typical politician. In Chicago, Jeff Goldblatt, Fox News.

Yesterday on Fox News…

Yesterday (April 1), Brit Hume’s “Special Report” featured a story on Kevorkian’s plan to run for Congress in Michigan’s 9th District. I was interviewed for the story as a representative of Not Dead Yet.

I received an anonymous tip that a copy of the story is now online:

I will try to transcribe the video by sometime on Friday to make the content accessible for those people who prefer or need print as their information source. (Update: transcription is done!)

In the meantime, Foxnews.com has a print article with much of the content that is in the video piece – not surprising since the author of the article is also the reporter in the video piece:

Amid Skepticism, Jack “Dr. Death” Death Kevorkian Runs for Congress:

By Jeff Goldblatt

Assisted-suicide advocate Jack Kevorkian Tuesday received the paperwork he’ll need to fill out in order to run for Congress as an Independent in Michigan’s ninth district.

Nicknamed Dr. Death, Kevorkian, who served eight years in prison for second-degree murder, will now see if he can gain the 3,000 signatures he needs by mid-July to get on the ballot.

Before Kevorkian was released early from his 10 to 25 year prison sentence in 2007 for his role in the assisted suicide of a 52-year-old man with Lou Gehrig’s Disease, Kevorkian’s attorneys told Michigan’s Parole Board that their client was in poor health and months away from death.

Fast-forward to today, and a resurrected Kevorkian says if elected he’ll crusade for individual rights.

“Without rights, life isn’t worth living,” Kevorkian told FOX News Tuesday in a rare sit-down interview. “I want to fight for our rights. Prison reform, educational reform. I want to do all that, plus satisfy the desires of my constituents.”

Kevorkian, a retired pathologist who claims to have helped at least 130 people die from 1990 until 1998, jumped into the race last Monday.

He calls the government tyrannical and said if elected he’ll call attention to the Ninth Amendment, which says “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

Kevorkian said this is what gives us our natural rights. “It says that you have every right in the world, because you were born with them … as long as nobody gets hurt or is threatened,” said Kevorkian. He interprets this as a protection of the right to die through assisted suicide.

“They never talk about it in school,” he said. “I became aware of it when I was almost 70 years old. And then I read it. Then I realized what it meant: It’s the most powerful amendment in the Bill of Rights.”

But some say Kevorkian’s election bid is nothing more than a publicity stunt.

“Kevorkian has never fought for anyone’s rights but his own,” said Stephen Drake, research assistant of Not Dead Yet, a disability rights organization opposed to legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia. “He wants to be the center of attention. This is what this is about,” said Drake.

Kevorkian said that on reputation alone he’ll collect the signatures he needs to be placed on the ballot as an Independent.

His opponents, former Michigan Lottery Commissioner Gary Peters (D), the Democrat, and eight-term GOP incumbent, Joe Knollenberg, say they want to focus
on the economy and not Kevorkian.

But Oakland University political science professor Dave Dulio says Kevorkian could be a factor in this race, which the national Democratic Party has targeted in the wake of Knollenberg’s narrow victory two years ago against a relative unknown.

“He has name identification, yes, but you can’t get elected on name ID alone,” said Dulio. Dulio predicts Kevorkian won’t win, partly because he won’t take campaign contributions. “You need to tell people why they need to vote for you, rather than the other candidates, and that’s what he can’t do with no money.”

But Kevorkian stresses it’s the message that counts, not the money. He said that he won’t hire a campaign staff and intends to meet voters the old-fashioned way: face to face. “I’m more honest than they are,” he said, speaking of his opponents. “Nobody in any party or any religion really has a free mind.”

I’ll leave it to others to notice what points I made that are mentioned in the introduction – and that it’s left to a political science professor to assert that Kevorkian might have an impact on the election, although he doesn’t say in which direction.

Needless to say, the quote included in the article and the video segment isn’t the one I would have chosen out of the several points I made when interviewed.

But that isn’t a complaint, really. The fact is, if you’re interviewed for a story, it’s the reporter’s decision as to what fits into the story that he or she is putting together. Sometimes their choices of what’s important will be the same as ours, and other times they won’t.

And certainly, I am in no position to complain – I wasn’t filmed or quoted in a way that made me look stupid or scary. And the reporter thought that I – and Not Dead Yet – should be included in this story. –Stephen Drake

Karen McCarron Sentenced to 36 Years for Murder of Katie

The waiting is over.

Just a couple of hours ago, from the Peoria Journal-Star:

PEKIN – Karen McCarron was sentenced to 36 years in prison today for suffocating her autistic daughter in 2006 and a request for a new trial was denied.

McCarron will have to serve 100 percent of the sentence and would be 75-years-old upon her release. She also was ordered to pay a $25,000 fine and was given 30 months of supervised release. She had faced between 20 years and 110 years in prison.

McCarron’s attorney, Marc Wolfe, said any decision to appeal will come from McCarron and said no decision has been made yet.

McCarron, 39, was found guilty on Jan. 17 of two counts of first-degree murder, one count of obstructing justice and one count of concealment of a homicidal death after a jury deliberated for nine hours during the course of two days.

McCarron suffocated her daughter Katherine “Katie” McCarron with a garbage bag and told authorities she found the girl not breathing in bed.

McCarron took the stand during her nine-day trial and demonstrated for jurors how she suffocated her daughter by placing a garbage bag around the arm of Kevin Johnson, chief assistant Tazewell County state’s attorney.

She also said she attempted to suffocate the child with a pillow three days before she killed her with the plastic bag.

For most of us, this brings a probable end to a horrible chapter in media bias, so-called “advocacy” groups, and the tragedy of promising lives snuffed out early and violently.

For the McCarron family, of course, this nightmare never really ends.

From all of us here, our loving thoughts and wishes go out to Mike McCarron, Paul McCarron and the other people in Katie’s life who loved her and treasured her for he brief span on this planet. –Stephen Drake

“Brain dead” man “comes alive” – a miracle, naturally

Last week, Dateline featured a story on Zack Dunlap. Dunlap, 21, had a bad accident on a 4-wheeler, causing severe head trauma. At the hospital, they declared him “brain dead” – and it really does appear that they did some thorough testing to determine this. Here are excerpts from the transcript on MSNBC:

(Note: Doug and Pam Dunlap are Zack’s father and mother)

Dr. Mercer: His brain injuries were absolutely catastrophic.

Dr. Leo Mercer, Director of Trauma Services at United Regional, said Zack’s condition deteriorated as the hours wore on. With the young Oklahoman unresponsive to any sensory stimulation, the doctor wondered if they’d already
lost him. He apprised Pam and Doug of his findings.

Dr. Mercer: I told them that I was going to order a confirmatory test, a brain flow study.
(At the scanner)

We actually scan it twice…

A blood flow scan would determine if there was any blood still coursing through Zack’s brain. The results couldn’t have been worse.

Pam Dunlap: The doctor took us in and showed us the image on the computer. And he told us the dark areas will be the areas where there’s no blood flow to the brain.

Doug Dunlap: And that was the whole brain. That was the whole thing. It was just black.

Natalie Morales: Were the doctors giving you any sense of hope?

Doug Dunlap: They were already saying he was brain-dead.

(Looking at brain scan)

Natalie Morales: So, when you see this, I mean, he was in a permanent vegetative state?

Dr. Mercer: No, he was dead. He meets the legal, medical requirements for declaring a patient brain dead.

Since Zack’s license indicated he was an organ donor, they agreed to have his organs harvested so that others could be saved. To make a long story short, two friends who happen to be nurses have a “gut feeling” that he doesn’t look “ready.” One of them scraped Zack’s foot with a pocket knife and was astonished when the foot jerked away. Later, in front of disbelieving medical personnel, he dug his fingernail under Zack’s nail – causing Zack to bring his opposite hand over to bat him away. This resulted in a full stop of transplant plans and they went into rescue mode.

By all counts, Zack has made a remarkable recovery. He is mobile, alert, interactive – and he’s back home – 48 days after being declared “dead.”

Everyone’s calling it a “miracle.”

Me, I’m a little bothered by that particular leap of faith. Does this use of the word “miracle” simply give us permission to avoid asking bothersome questions about diagnostic procedures at the hospital – or maybe even about the “certainty” attached to the diagnosis of “brain death.”

Because calling it a “miracle” lets to medical people off the hook. Calling it a “miracle” prevents us from asking if others who have been declared “brain dead” might have been like Zack Dunlap – only not as lucky as Zack, because they had no one looking to see if maybe he might be alive after all.

The use of the term “miracle” is common in stories like these – and I’ve written about it before in relation to other stories of “miraculous” recoveries:

The next time you see a story like that of Finley, Ramirez, or Poutre, avoid thinking of them as “miracles” and think of them as survivors. And let’s ask their doctors how many other patients they’re treating aren’t quite so lucky.

I feel the same way now. So, if y’all don’t mind, I’ll think of Zack Dunlap as a “survior” rather than as a “miracle.” “Miracles” defy definition – stories of survival invite further exploration. –Stephen Drake