Update from the Front in DC – ADAPT at McCain HQ!

This comes to me from Ari Ne’eman, who received the word from ADAPT organizer/activist Amber Smock:

FYI, ADAPTers have struck McCain campaign headquarters in Crystal City. The objective is to get the McCain campaign to agree to support the ADAPT housing platform. Updates and news are at www.duhcity.org. A group of ADAPTers, under heavy police watch, also visited the Democratic Party Headquarters and invited Dems to visit DUH City at HUD.

Hope to get pictures and more pictures later. Will update in this post or in a separate one, depending on my mood. –Stephen Drake

UPDATE!

Same sources as above:

About 100 activists have stormed McCain’s office, and there is apparently a lot of screaming going on. McCain staff refuse to relay the platform to McCain. Rumor is arrests have started, but that is to be confirmed. Oh to clarify they have stormed McCain’s campaign hq. Info is still flowing in…

Stay tuned for updates!

ADAPT Confronts HUD in DC (Day 1)

Last year, this blog covered the activities of ADAPT during its protests in Chicago. To a lot of readers coming to this blog from outside of the disability community, this might seem like a departure from our usual focus. It’s not. Not Dead Yet is a disability rights organization that engages in activism, including direct action. A majority of the disability activists who have marched, protested, chanted and even been arrested under the NDY banner were ADAPT activists (and still are) long before NDY was formed.

And make no mistake, the issues that ADAPT takes on are life and death issues for the millions of American with disabilities of all ages.

This year, ADAPT is off to an early start. Very early.

Between 4:30 and 5:00 am ET Diane Coleman sent me two pictures from the scene outside HUD offices this morning:

Blue dome tent being set up on pavementbanner - in our homes or in your face!

So why HUD? Inaction and broken promises by HUD are largely responsible for a drastic shortage of accessible and affordable housing – forcing many people with disabilties into the streets or into nursing homes.

ADAPT has set up a website, with multimedia, its own daily newspaper and other features. You can check it out at DUHCity.org (DUH is HUD backwards).

Below is a text version of the DUH platform – ADAPT’s plan to provide accessible, affordable, integrated housing for people with disabilities – a nicer version is available at the DUH City site in pdf format.

DUH Platform:

ACCESSIBLE, AFFORDABLE, INTEGRATED HOUSING
A housing plan to free people with disabilities
from unwanted institutional placement
developed by the ADAPT Community

People with disabilities across the United States are forced into institutions, like nursing facilities, due to the lack of housing that meets their needs for accessibility, affordability, and integration. In many states, housing is the number one reason that people with disabilities, of all ages, are forced into institutions. Simply put, people with disabilities face a HOUSING CRISIS. There is little housing that is accessible, even less that is also affordable, and still less that is also integrated.

ADAPT demands that Congress and the President work together to implement the following solutions as part of a comprehensive strategy of ending the housing crisis that forces hundreds of thousands of people with disabilities into institutions.

ACCESSIBLE

People with significant disabilities often cannot find housing that allows them to simply get in the front door. There are few requirements to build apartments and homes that are accessible and what requirements there are have been poorly enforced. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is rarely heeded by housing authorities and rarely enforced by The U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Fair Housing Amendments Act has limited impact and, again, enforcement is sparse. Many thousands of units that should have been accessible are not, due to the lack of enforcement.

Additionally, people with disabilities want and deserve accessible housing that is permanent, not temporary or transitional accessible housing that is provided in some situations.

In order to provide enough housing to meet the need for permanent accessible housing for people with disabilities currently living in the community and the hundreds of thousands who want to leave institutions, ADAPT demands that:

• HUD increase enforcement of existing Section 504 Accessibility requirements.
• HUD double the requirements of Section 504 for 10 years to make up for past failures in compliance: 10% of units to be built as mobility-disability accessible and 4% sensory disability
accessible.
• Congress and the President develop permanent funding for a “Barrier Elimination Trust Fund” for accessibility modifications for people transitioning out of facilities and those at risk of going into facilities. This fund shall be $20,000,000 available to be spent annually, plus an increase
tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Fines for failure to comply with Section 504 and Fair Housing Amendments Act requirements could also be used to supplement this trust fund.
• Congress and the President enact the Inclusive Home Design Act (H.R. 4202 in the 110th Congress).
• HUD end the practice of funding townhomes. Townhomes are inaccessible by design. Our Government should not be in the business of funding any kind of project that absolutely
discriminates against any population.

AFFORDABLE

People with disabilities frequently live on very-low, fixed incomes. Only about 30% of people with disabilities are employed; the majority of these are working at low wage jobs. People with significant disabilities have even fewer opportunities for employment. People with disabilities are unable to afford much of the housing that is considered “affordable” by non-disabled standards. Many people with disabilities people live well below 20% of Area Median Income (AMI).

People trapped in institutions receive a monthly “allowance” of approximately $40, making it impossible to save enough for a security deposit or to buy the most basic necessities to move
into the community, like furniture, curtains, bedding or cookware.

In order to make housing affordable to people with disabilities moving out of institutions, ADAPT demands that:

• Congress and the President create 5000 new housing vouchers each year for 10 years and target them to people transitioning out of nursing facilities or other institutions. HUD and the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) must work together to make sure that these vouchers go to people, regardless of type of disability or age, living in nursing facilities and other institutions. This cooperation has begun with implementation of the Money Follows the Person Demonstration program but needs to be vastly expanded.
• HUD establish policies and procedures to ensure that all these vouchers are tracked and continue to be targeted to people with disabilities when the vouchers are returned to the Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) after an individual is no longer eligible or in need.
• Congress and the President double the funding for construction of accessible, affordable, integrated housing to end the crisis that people with disabilities of all ages and disabilities confront when they seek a place to live.
• The HUD Secretary continue to issue periodic Public and Indian Housing (PIH) directives to PHAs strongly encouraging local preferences in their voucher programs for people trapped in
nursing facilities.
• Mainstream and Fair Share vouchers that were turned into regular Housing Choice (formerly Section 8) vouchers, due to poor oversight by HUD and PHAs, be recommitted to people with
disabilities. The Fair Share and Mainstream Voucher Programs were created to address the housing needs of very low income people with disabilities. However, many of these vouchers were lost to us, since they were never tracked and many Housing Authorities gave them to other populations.
• People in nursing homes and other institutions, regardless of disability or age, be nationally recognized as homeless. In memos as far back as 1998, HUD recognized that the “needs of
persons with disabilities are not met by beds in nursing homes or other service centered facilities.” Unfortunately, this wisdom has not been acted upon and people with disabilities are not eligible for the various housing programs available if a person is “homeless”. Many localities do not or will not make people with disabilities part of the preference given to those who are
homeless. People with disabilities who are in unwanted institutional placements should be considered homeless and thereby be eligible to access more housing resources locally.
• HUD target resources to people at the lowest income levels and continue to provide vouchers to and fund housing development for people with disabilities with very low incomes.

INTEGRATED

Legislative history from the turn of the century shows that people with disabilities have been
viewed as everything from “unfit” to “dangerous” to a “detriment to normal society.” These views directly led to the establishment of our nation’s very long history of government imposed
segregation of people with disabilities.

The housing options in this system of imposed segregation are large warehouse-like state
operated institutions and smaller institutions, such as group homes. People with disabilities are
considered “sick” and in need of treatment to be cured. The perception that people with disabilities need to be “treated” unfortunately continues in our society today. Housing options for people with disabilities, therefore, have resembled medical centers rather than what most people would call a home.

The vast majority of 811 housing funding currently builds housing that is segregated and institutional, for example, diagnosis specific projects where only people with a specific type of
disability are allowed to live. This is unacceptable.

In addition, efforts to remove people with disabilities from 202 Elderly housing started in the early 1990s and have resulted in further restricting the housing available to people with disabilities. This terrible discrimination for the “crime” of having a disability is sanctioned by the federal government. ADAPT opposes these 202 designation plans as they eliminate housing options for people with disabilities.

Our people want to live in the community, with their non-disabled peers, not in any of the various forms of “crip ghettos”. In order to accomplish this, ADAPT demands that:

• Congress and the President issue a directive to HUD that at least 50% of all new 811 funding
must be used in integrated housing.
• Congress and the President issue a directive to HUD that not more than 25% of a new building/ development can be funded by 811.
• HUD streamline the process for using 811 funding in integrated settings.
• HUD place a moratorium on 202 designation plans until the housing crisis for people with disabilities is over.
• HUD limit the size of “group homes” to no more than four individuals.
• Congress and the President eliminate the HUD Secretary’s ability to waive the limits on maximum number of residents in group homes and independent living facilities.

More tomorrow – at the latest. –Stephen Drake

JFActivist blog: How the Republicans and Democrats are Talking About Disability

Anne Sommers, the Policy Counsel for the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD), moderates the JFActivist blog. For readers outside of the disability community, “JFA” stands for “Justice For All.”

Just a few days ago, Anne combed the platforms of the Republican and Democratic parties for items relevant to the interests and concerns of Americans with disabilities. The Republican platform has two items of particular interest to NDY activists and allies:

Physician-Assisted Suicide (from the section “Health Care Reform: Putting Patients First” and subsection “Funding Medical Research”) – We believe medicines and treatments should be designed to prolong and enhance life, not destroy it. Therefore, federal funds should not be used for drugs that cause the destruction of human life. Furthermore, the Drug Enforcement Administration ban on use of controlled substances for physician-assisted suicide should be restored.

(from the section “Maintaining the Sanctity and Dignity of Human Life”) – Respect for life requires efforts to include persons with disabilities in education, employment, the justice system, and civic participation. In keeping with that commitment, we oppose the nonconsensual withholding of care or treatment from people with disabilities, as well as the elderly and infirm, just as we oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide, which endanger especially those on the margins of society.

Needless to say, having it on paper and actually taking things on as priorities are two different things. Which also holds true for everything related to disability in both party platforms. At the very least, though it is worthwhile for us all to take a look at these platforms so we can look at the positions that the two parties have invited us to hold them to.

Check out “How are the RNC and the DNC talking about disability?” to see what Anne has culled from the two platforms. –Stephen Drake

Important “New” ICAD Blog – and Important Info on Joe Biden

I’m still trying to catch up with things I’ve missed while being offline the past few months. One happy discovery was to find that Dick Sobsey started up the ICAD blog in July and has been posting on it regularly. Some readers might be familiar with ICAD – the International Coalition on Abuse and Disabilities – a listserv that was populated by a broad spectrum of parents, professionals, academics and disability activists.

This an important resource for anyone who wants to keep abreast of developments relating to the abuse of people with disabilities. Dick is currently the Director of the John Dossetor Health Ethics Center at the University of Alberta. You can read about Dick’s professional career and his “real life.” Both are worth checking out.

Also worth reading are these two classics he’s written:

Father’s Day 2000 and Why we shouldn’t blame the murders of disabled kids on lousy services.

As mentioned in the post title, Dick shared some news about Democratic VP Candidate Joe Biden that should be of interest to folks in the disability community:

27 August 2008 Denver, CO USA Tonight Senator Joe Biden received the Democratic Party’s nomination for Vice-President of the United States. Less than one year ago on Oct 25th, Senator Biden introduced the Crime Victims with Disabilities Act of 2007 as part of Senate Bill 2237, Crime Control and Prevention Act of 2007. Biden has also advocated for expanding Federal Hate Crimes Legislation to include bias crimes against people with disabilities and has been strong supporter of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Obama has also pledged to get the US to sign on the the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and was an original sponsor of the Bill to expand hate crime legislation to cover disability. This may be starting out like a paid political announcement for Obama-Biden, but it’s not. It is, however, a plea to everyone who cares about crimes against people with disabilities and the general welfare of Americans with disabilities to get involved with the upcoming election. We need to be asking BOTH PARTIES what they will do if elected to move the agenda for people with disabilities forward. Will Obama and Biden put the Crime Victims with Disabilities Act high on their legislative agenda?

For more information on this proposed legislation and the wording of the bill, please go check out the link provided immediatey before the blog excerpt. –Stephen Drake

Dorothy Livadas is Dead

The Democrat & Chronicle reports that Dorothy Livadas died after being removed from her ventilator today:

Strong Memorial Hospital officials confirmed that Dorothy Livadas, the 97-year-old Rochester woman whose end-of-life care was the center of a months-long legal battle, died this afternoon. Livadas had remained on a ventilator for about seven months, while her daughter Ianthe and health care providers disputed her wishes in court.

Hospital doctors and representatives from Catholic Family Center, Dorothy’s court-appointed guardian, had argued in court papers that the woman’s living will clearly states that she would not want to survive by artificial means. Ianthe contended that her mother should have been given every chance to recover from what doctors labeled an irreversible coma.

According to Ianthe, hospital staff had planned to disconnect Dorothy from the ventilator at about 12:30 p.m. today, nine days after an appellate division of the state Supreme Court refused to extend the deadline for legal challenges to plans to remove life support.

Catholic Family Center has repeatedly declined to comment on the case.

It’s pretty likely that, given the strategic timing of Dorothy Livadas’s death, there won’t be much more coverage than this. –Stephen Drake