NewsBiscuit: “Homeopath to start offering ‘assisted-suicide’ remedy” (UK)

It was bound to happen.  At least one New Age practitioner has decided to cash in jump into the arena of assisted suicide.

From NewsBiscuit – The News Before It Happens…

Homeopath to start offering ‘assisted-suicide’ remedy

A homeopath in Banbury has decided to take politics into her own hands and start offering an assisted-suicide treatment. The service will be offered to those with terminal illnesses where traditional homeopathic treatments have not worked. The number of eligible people is thought to be high.

The practitioner, who goes by the name Chi Wind-Chime, explained that the ‘remedy’ used has been through the emotional turmoil of death, which is then remembered, and injected into the patient. ‘We take our special ‘faucet hydrogen dioxide’ formula to a funeral, where it is surrounded by mourning people. This emotional experience of someone passing is remembered by the special solution. We take this back to my ‘living room laboratory’ where it is diluted with more of the original solution to create a remedy that is so weak its strength is lethal.’

‘When the time comes, a family member can inject the patient, then wait for the treatment to work,’ Ms Wind-Chime continued. ‘The ‘passing room’ is painted lilac and we play whale song to create an atmosphere that is relaxed and peaceful, which is just as well because the effects of treatments on the terminally ill can take up to two years.’

Brenda Roberts took her mother to the homeopath to assist her in ending her life, but was not happy with the results. ‘She had got to a point where her quality of life was not what we wanted, so we convinced her that life was not worth living. So for her 50th birthday we all chipped in and paid for her trip to Ms Wind-Chime and she went through the treatment. That was 4 years ago and we are still waiting for her to keel over.’

Please read the rest of the “news” story here – and remember that it’s satire.

Australia – Great Essay: Looking at the Bigger Picture Regarding Euthanasia

There’s been a lot written over the past week in response to the news of the double euthanasia of Marc and Eddy Verbessem, the 45-year-old twins who were deaf and losing their vision.

So far, my favorite is from Craig Wallace, President of People with Disability Australia (PWDA).  On January 21st, Ramp-Up, ABC Australia‘s site dedicated to disability issues, published an opinion essay by Wallace titled “Euthanasia: let’s look at the bigger picture.”

Wallace examines the treatment of the Verbessem twins’ deaths and other suicides – something I and others have done in the past.  To be honest, I don’t think I’ve ever done it quite as well as Wallace does in his essay:

It is significant that the focus of articles about euthanasia and end of life planning like this one in The Australian hastily drift into how much it costs the community to keep people with intensive support needs going. How quickly compassion dies and the calculators come out.

In the current world of rationed care and economic rationalism, it is not hard to imagine a situation where the availability of euthanasia becomes seen as a cheaper, easier, ‘rational’ option to providing intensive support, community living and care for those most vulnerable. Instead of having the support to make well-considered choices, the services that make life bearable could fall away and people with disabilities could be levered into taking their lives as the default option.

Euthanasia can become a euphemism which sanitises what is, essentially, suicide. It is hard to see what separated euthanasia from suicide for Mark and Eddy, except they had a disability.

Suicide is not a lifestyle option. It’s the end of any choice, good or bad. It’s choice denying. Also, suicide is handled in a very careful way by the media – it is often unreported to discourage copycat deaths and published articles usually carry warnings.

Suicide is something society discourages for every group of people. Except when they are talking about people with disabilities. No suggestions to call Lifeline or get help in articles like this one – instead we are told “they were very happy” and “it was a relief”. The doctor who helped the twins take their lives reportedly described their end as a “gift”.

What does it say about the perceived value of people with disabilities when our deaths are described in clinical terms and counted as a blessing?

People take their lives for all sorts of reasons – they might be bankrupt, old, ill, lonely, overworked, trapped in poverty, abused, addicted, confused about their sexuality, at the sharp edge of family breakdown, in shame or at the end of a long set of bad life experiences.

If suicide is a gift for one group of people who feel their lives have become unbearable, then why not for everyone who feels like this? Imagine the reaction if someone wrote about the tragic, senseless death of UK nurse Jacintha Saldanha and described it as a “relief”.

For those with a short memory – I confess to being one of them – here’s a reminder via wikipedia, about the death of Jacintha Saldanha:

Jacintha Saldanha was a nurse who worked at King Edward VII’s Hospital Sister Agnes, London. She was found dead by apparent suicide, three days after receiving a hoax call. The prank call was part of the Australian radio programme Hot30 Countdown, broadcast on the Austereo-owned station 2Day FM. In it, the hosts impersonated Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles enquiring about the health of the Duchess of Cambridge, who was, at the time, a patient staying at the hospital. Saldhana fell for the hoax and transferred the call to the nurse looking after the Duchess. A hospital spokesperson said that she was the “victim of a cruel journalistic trick”.

Please go read the entire essay.  Craig Wallace has put together a concise statement of some of the uglier realities hiding behind the “sympathy” directed at disabled people who want to kill themselves (or want to be killed) and to contrast the reactions of the media and the public to stories like the Belgian double euthanasia to other stories about suicide.

Please go visit the article and read it here.  And consider leaving a comment.  I plan to after I finish posting this.

 

Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Discussed and Debated on Huffington Post Live

Last Thursday, January 16th, “Huffington Post Live” featured a 30 minute discussion of assisted suicide, euthanasia, and the right to die – specifically how these issues play out in the USA.

The program was hosted by Josh Zepps, an Australian with who has a  self-admitted libertarian bent (a great definition of libertarians someone shared with me was “holding the firm belief in the absolute right of both rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges).

Pat LaMarche appeared on the “pro” side – she wrote a blog last April about a man with ALS whose last wish was that he could legally get direct assistance – euthanasia – instead of having to self-administer a lethal dose on his own.

Fran Schindler – a “regional care coordinator” for the Final Exit Network (FEN) also appeared for the “pro” side.

Tim Rosales appeared as a spokesperson for the Californians Against Assisted Suicide.

John Kelly, Director of “Second Thoughts,” also appeared on the “anti” side, presenting the perspective of disability activists opposed to assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Points/claims made by Pat LaMarche:

  • People with ALS die by “choking” to death  if they don’t find a way to die earlier in the process;
  • Assisted suicide isn’t enough, people are “forced” to take their own lives earlier than they’d like and would live longer if someone could do it for them;
  • Used the words “horrible” and “agony” to describe deaths that people are “forced” to have (some form of “agony” was used 5 times by her).
  • Made the statement “I honor the disabled person and I honor that they may want to go on… (yeah – I’m pretty sure I heard that stress on the “may.”) Feel free to groan – I did.

Fran Schindler – seemed to be on a short leash.  Most of what she said came directly from a written document, obviously meant to make sure she didn’t use her own words.  When she did stray off script, I could appreciate the cause for concern on the part of FEN – she referred to John Kelly as “the gentleman in the wheelchair” and then went on a rant about Lawrence Egbert and exit bags in response to something John Kelly said – probably very hard for viewers to make sense of.

Tim Rosales – Tim listed the types of organizations and groups opposed to assisted suicide and also started to critique the “safeguards” in legislation.  He also gave a detailed account of the many pressures – financial, family, societal – that can come to bear in a health care system like ours, negating real “choice” – which seemed to reach the host in a way that John Kelly’s mention of the same points didn’t.  Tim also corrected the host in labeling minority opposition to social conservatism, saying they also distrust the government in the current atmosphere.  (Actually, like people with disabilities, many minority members distrust the medical profession itself due to mistreatment or discrimination in trying to get health care.)

John Kelly – Said that pain isn’t a common reason give for wanting to commit suicide – “being a burden” come much higher on the list.  Also, John made the case that legalization – contrary to “libertarian” assertions – increases state involvement by creating a state program to sanction suicide, which sounds OK in some “fairy tale world,” but not in the one he lives in which involves discrimination and pressures toward feeling a burden and a distrust of professionals shared by many people with disabilities.

Just for those who like to do some fact-checking, here are a couple of helpful links:

This link is to a pdf version of the 2012 Oregon “Death With Dignity” report, which includes a summary of data collected from 1998-2011 as well as data (such as they are) for the current year.  You’ll find that a low percentage giving “pain” as a reason for wanting lethal medication is low – almost certainly lower than the actual percentage since “fear of inadequate pain treatment” is lumped together with “inadequate pain treatment.”

The article “Reasons for Living with ALS” is from the ALS  Society.  Here is an excerpt dealing with LaMarche’s false claim that death in ALS comes by “choking to death.”:

Choking
I can remember how frightened my daughters and I were that Tom would die choking, like a drowning man, and we would have to stand by helplessly,” recounts Pat Snyder, R.N. who lost her husband to ALS in 1997. “Our doctor told me that this would not happen and Tom would die peacefully – and he did. His breathing became slower and shallower and he went to sleep. In several hours he died peacefully. He was able to spend his entire illness at home with his family and we were comforted that he did not suffer.”

Some people with ALS fear they will die choking and gasping for air. This fear can create panic for both patients and their families. The reality is that most people with ALS die very peacefully and for those who do have trouble breathing or experience choking, there are things that can be done to reduce or eliminate these problems. Having the patient and family prepared to create an atmosphere of comfort and dignity at the time of death can assure a death without pain or anxiety. By discussing concerns in advance with their physician and nurse, patients and caregivers can be prepared with medications, nasal ventilation, oxygen and suction in the unlikely event that these interventions are needed to assure the patient is comfortable as death draws closer.

While the re-use of “exit bags” by FEN’s ex-medical director Larry Egbert came up, it’s also important to know that the recent PBS documentary (linked on the Huffpo Live page) shows a previously unknown videotape of FEN’s Ted Goodwin explaining how he holds people’s hands down to keep them from “inadvertently” tearing the exit bag off – the person he explained it to was an undercover Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent.  Check out this NDY post for a discussion and a link to the specific segment with Goodwin’s videotape.

Finally, please check out the embedded video below to watch the archived discussion from Huffington Post Live:

 

Canada: Toujours Vivant-Not Dead Yet Director Amy Hasbrouck on CBC panel on possible Quebec Move to Legalize Assisted Suicide

On Friday, January 18th, Amy Hasbrouck, Director of Toujours Vivant-Not Dead Yet, participated in a panel on CBC – explaining the opposition of disability advocates to legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Here’s a description from the CBC site:

Quebec’s Right to Die Legislation: Will other provinces follow?

This week, the province of Quebec announced its intention to legalize some cases of physician-assisted suicide. It puts the province in direct conflict with Canada’s Criminal Code, which prohibits all forms of assisted suicide.

But a panel of legal experts advised the province that end-of- life care can fall under the healthcare umbrella — an area of provincial jurisdiction. Quebec’s junior health minister, Veronique Hivon explained the decision to reporters. We aired a clip.

Those in favour of more choice in end-of-life care hope this will set a precedent for the other provinces. But, some worry about the slippery slope…. putting the elderly and disabled in danger.

The laws against assisted suicide do seem to be under pressure. In June, a BC judge granted Gloria Taylor, a woman who suffered from ALS — the right to an assisted suicide, effectively striking down parts of the Criminal Code. Taylor died of natural causes in October, but the federal government is pressing ahead with an appeal and says it has no plans to reopen the debate.

We’ve assembled a panel today as part of our season-long series on ethical issues, Line in the Sand.

Russel Ogden is a criminologist as well as the director of the Farewell Foundation which supports assisted death. He’s been present at 6 “self-chosen” deaths here in Canada, the US and Switzerland. He was in our Vancouver studio.

Amy Hasbrouck is the director of Toujours Vivant – Not Dead Yet, a project of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities. She was in Montreal.

And Dr. Kerry Bowman is a bioethicist at the University of Toronto. He was in our Toronto studio.

This segment was produced by The Current’s Dawna Dingwall.

The show is archived.  You can listen to it here.

National Association of the Deaf and American Association of the Deaf-Blind Respond to Belgium’s Euthanasia of Deaf-Blind Twins

On Sunday, January 20th, the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) and the American Association of the Deaf-Blind issued a joint statement in response to the euthanasia of deaf twins in Belgium who were losing their vision.

From the joint statement:

The National Association of the Deaf (NAD), the premier civil rights organization for deaf and hard of hearing individuals in the United States, and the American Association of the Deaf-Blind (AADB), the national consumer organization dedicated to the rights of the deaf-blind community, join forces to express their grave concerns that a national government has failed to provide meaningful support in life for its citizens, particularly those who are deaf and becoming blind as well as taking on other disabilities.

These concerns relate to Belgium, where deaf twins Marc and Eddy Verbessem had sought voluntary euthanasia, persisted in seeking it after their initial request was denied, and ultimately secured this tragic result.

Read the rest of the joint statement here.